Continuing the saga from OK Cupid: I responded. Yeah, probably shouldn’t have, but the Wingnut Christmas thing really pushes my buttons. So here’s what I wrote to him:
Well, now I’ve seen it all. 9/11 as a pickup line. Though you’re not the first member of the Giuliani administration to be macking on the bodies of the dead.
Even if I didn’t find that offensive, your spam approach, not to mention your association with that authoritarian asshat Giuliani, would have killed any chance you and your blank profile would have with me.
I see some grammar issues. Probably should be “macking over” instead of “macking on” (as “macking on” implies necrophilia) and “would have had.” Nonetheless. His response [misspellings his own]:
You know, I often wonder if framing my relationship with a political figure would be a mixed blessing, or for that matter, wise. The land in which I come from, obviously not liberal-land as do you, character means a great deal. I’m proud of my association with Mayor Giuliani and proud of my character and the way I have conducted myself thoughout my life and with others. Obviously, these virtues are meaningless to you. So be it.
I dont know what rock you have crawed out from under in answering my reply to your profile the way you have, but most assuredly it is to my benefit. A good dinner and better glass of wine would have been otherwise wasted during a dreadful encounter that potentially we would have had.
Oh, and one more thing, when you have engrained in your mind the experience of having pulled parts of people out from under debris and rubble, yeah, you have a right to talk about it all you like…
Because shut up, that’s why!

Recent Comments